In this paper, the gauche interaction in trans -1,2-dimethylcyclohexane is calculated to be 0. The calculation of the conformational structures of hydrocarbons by the Westheimer-Hendrickson-Wiberg method Norman L. Van Catledge, and Jerry A. Conformational Studies. The conformation of phenylcyclohexane, and related molecules L. Allinger and M. Tribble Tet. Cordes, Alexandra M. Computational analysis shows that it has a barrier to interconversion of approx.
Gurvinder Gill, Diwakar M. Pawar, and Eric A. Noe J. Interestingly the twist-boat conformer of this molecule is only slightly lower in energy 0.
Polar Aprotic? Are Acids! What Holds The Nucleus Together? This was really really helpful to me. I appreciate it. Keep up your good jobs! It was really helpful. Also the content was straight to the point. Thanx a lot. When looking at the two possible ring-clip chair conformations, one has all of the substituents axial and the other has all the substutents equatorial.
Even without a calculation, it is clear that the conformation with all equatorial substituents is the most stable and glucose will most commonly be found in this conformation. The six carbon sugar, fructose, in aqueous solution is also a six-membered ring in a chair conformation. Which of the two possible chair conformations would be expected to be the most stable?
The lower energy chair conformation is the one with three of the five substituents including the bulky —CH 2 OH group in the equatorial position pictured on the right. The left structure has 3 equatorial substituents while the structure on the right only has two equatorial substituents. Draw the two chair conformations for cis ethylmethylcyclohexane using bond-line structures and indicate the more energetically favored conformation. Draw the most stable conformation for trans ethylmethylcyclohexane using bond-line structures.
Draw the most stable conformation for trans t -butylmethylcyclohexane using bond-line structures. Draw the most stable conformation fo trans isopropylmethylcyclohexane. Draw the two chair conformations of the six-carbon sugar mannose, being sure to clearly show each non-hydrogen substituent as axial or equatorial. Predict which conformation is likely to be more stable, and explain why.
In order to change the relationship of two substituents on a ring from cis to trans , you would need to break and reform two covalent bonds. Ring flips involve only rotation of single bonds.
For the following molecules draw the most stable chair conformation and explain why you chose this as an answer. Steven Farmer Sonoma State University. Jim Clark Chemguide. Objective After completing this section, you should be able to use conformational analysis to determine the most stable conformation of a given disubstituted cyclohexane.
Key Terms Make certain that you can define, and use in context, the key term below. Study Notes When faced with the problem of trying to decide which of two conformers of a given disubstituted cyclohexane is the more stable, you may find the following generalizations helpful. A conformation in which both substituents are equatorial will always be more stable than a conformation with both groups axial.
When one substituent is axial and the other is equatorial, the most stable conformation will be the one with the bulkiest substituent in the equatorial position. Monosubstituted Cyclohexanes In the previous section, it was stated that the chair conformation in which the methyl group is equatorial is more stable because it minimizes steric repulsion, and thus the equilibrium favors the more stable conformer.
Disubstituted Cyclohexanes Determining the more stable chair conformation becomes more complex when there are two or more substituents attached to the cyclohexane ring. In this section, the effect of conformations on the relative stability of disubstituted cyclohexanes is examined using the two principles: Substituents prefer equatorial rather than axial positions in order to minimize the steric strain created of 1,3-diaxial interactions.
Keep it Simple. One the other hand, all axial substituents point either straight up or straight down. Draw the following structure in its most stable chair conformation: Answer. First, arbitrarily number the carbons. This numbering has nothing to do with naming the molecule, but it is only used to help keep track of where the substituents are in relation to one another. We then draw a regular chair conformation and a chair conformation in its flipped formed.
We now add substituents to each. At each carbon on the cyclohexane, there is a one substituent that points up and one that points down, which is something we will utilize in this step. If the substituent is a wedge on the 2-D cyclohexane, then place the substituent so it is going upward on the chair at the corresponding carbon e. If it is a dash , then place the substituent so it is facing downward on the corresponding carbon.
Do this for each chair shown above: Both of these answers would be correct if we just had to convert the 2-D to the 3-D structure; however, questions often ask for the most stable structure.
Since the left structure has both chlorine atoms in the axial position, the total additional energy due to 1,3-diaxial interactions is 4. The right molecule, on the other hand, has no axial substituents and therefore no extra energy. The following equations and formulas illustrate how the presence of two or more substituent on a cyclohexane ring perturbs the interconversion of the two chair conformers in ways that can be predicted.
When there is a potential energy difference between the conformers, then the lower energy conformation is favored as indicated by the equilibrium reaction arrows. In the case of 1,1-disubstituted cyclohexane s , one of the substituents must necessarily be axial and the other equatorial, regardless of which chair conformer is considered.
Since the substituents are the same in 1,1-dimethylcyclohexane, the two conformers are identical and present in equal concentration.
Consequently, the methyl group in this compound is almost exclusively axial in its orientation. In the cases of 1,2-, 1,3- and 1,4-disubstituted compounds the analysis is a bit more complex.
0コメント