He opened up to the New York Times' DealBook in a piece yesterday, saying that now that he is off of parole supervision, he feels free to discuss his six and a half years in prison and what led to it. These days, he happily rides the subway, sees his grandchildren, and lives in a two-bedroom apartment with his third wife, someone he met in his Wall Street days and who visited him in prison after her own divorce.
Kozlowski wouldn't tell the Times how much he's worth now, but did say that he currently owns a very small share in the New York Yankees and does some low-level mergers and acquisitions consulting out of an office a friend lent him in Manhattan.
What was the Tyco scandal? Corporate scandal of Former chairman and chief executive Dennis Kozlowski and former chief financial officer Mark H. During their trial in March , they contended the board of directors authorized it as compensation. Is Tyco toys still in business? When Tyco was purchased by Mattel on March 27, , it was the third largest toy company in the United States. Who owns Tyco? Johnson Controls Inc. When did Tyco ADT split?
Corporate history In , 57 district telegraph delivery companies affiliated and became "American District Telegraph" which became known as ADT. In July , Tyco merged by reverse takeover with a smaller publicly traded security services company named ADT Limited. When did JCI and Tyco merger? Prior to becoming CEO on Sept. Why was he so aggressive in his pursuit of you? CEOs and companies had been put on pedestals. Morgenthau was running for reelection and he was facing his first real challenge at the time.
He had been district attorney for many years. He wanted to show that he was going to prosecute white-collar crime as well as the day-to-day crimes of New York. I never saw him in the courtroom. Morgenthau had a big press conference when he indicted me, and then I never heard or saw from him again. But where I think my rights were violated was Tyco had an attorney named David Boies who was a big-time celebrity lawyer.
He was the attorney that the United States government hired when they wanted to break up Microsoft. David Boies was brought in by a couple of directors to investigate me. His job was to win. It was to win—as simple as that. He was paid to win, so I would not have to be paid my retention agreement, which was worth hundreds of millions of dollars to the company.
David Boies handed the case over to Morgenthau, but then David Boies, who was being paid to find me guilty as a prosecutor, was allowed to testify in front of the jury as if he was an employee of Tyco or as if he had some kind of objective opinion about the case.
Once Boies testified, my constitutional rights were violated. How is it possible in our judicial system, and with I would presume, capable representation, that these things were able to happen? I left the company in June, and I was not under any kind of investigation for any spending or any issues at all. I was indicted in September. In my opinion, they were handed a case by David Boies because of my retention agreement. My retention agreement was strongly worded.
It said that the only time Tyco would not have to pay that retention agreement was if I was found guilty of a felony that was materially injurious to Tyco. I never once had one discussion with a single director or anybody in that company from the day that I left on a Sunday and was indicted on Monday on sales taxes. I was never allowed back in the company.
I was never allowed back to my notes, my records, my information, my personal belongings. On that fine Monday, David took over and totally locked me out from the office. I was told that David Boies hired a PR firm to disparage me. Before that I was on the cover of business magazines doing well, and now it came time to bring me down. I was instructed by my lawyers not to speak to the media. Our first trial was a hung jury and it was ultimately declared a mistrial.
After the first trial, the DA offered we negotiated, we could get it down to one to two years of prison time with a small fine. None of that happened. We went back to trial. They were able to pick up on these issues—the shower curtain, the spending, the personal lifestyle—as opposed to the facts. Were you guilty of anything, legally?
KOZLOWSKI: If the board changed their mind about my compensation or felt that I was overpaid, there was a civil process that should have resolved this — certainly not a criminal process. But nobody ever came to me and asked me to give the money back or do anything. We went from infancy to adulthood without passing through adolescence.
And in that process, we never built the infra- structure or the documentation that most companies have to support the kind of growth we had. I was guilty of not building a corporate staff that was comparable to the size of the organization we were running. You were hardly viewed as dangerous. What was the justification? I was a high-profile inmate at the time, and the concern was that one of the gang members would get some notoriety by taking me out. So that was what was explained to me. So part of that justification, too, was to keep me from being taken advantage of.
I taught some people to get their high school equivalency in prison. And some of the books, the things they had were pretty archaic. And my brother-in-law was a special education teacher in New Jersey, so I had him send in all kinds of books and things they use, so we were able to have some better materials for some of the guys to use when they went for their exams.
These visits included [my now wife] Kim, who became very supportive. We met most Saturdays and Sundays and got to know one another over those years. We concluded that the criminal justice system is pretty screwed up and decided to do something about it when we had the opportunity. We help thousands of former inmates transition into society every year.
We have a passion for criminal justice reform and advocacy. But I had over a hundred employees visit while I was in prison. These were my senior staff, my secretaries, people up and down the organization.
0コメント